On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:39:05PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 15:32:03 +
> > From: Visa Hankala
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:15:05PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 14:56:45 +
> > > > From: Visa Hankala
> > > >
> > > > On
> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 15:32:03 +
> From: Visa Hankala
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:15:05PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 14:56:45 +
> > > From: Visa Hankala
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:46:22AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:15:05PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 14:56:45 +
> > From: Visa Hankala
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:46:22AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 02:04:30PM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 27, 2021
> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 14:56:45 +
> From: Visa Hankala
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:46:22AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 02:04:30PM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 07:40:26PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:46:22AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 02:04:30PM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 07:40:26PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 09:05:24AM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > > > When a CPU starts processing
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 02:04:30PM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 07:40:26PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 09:05:24AM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > > When a CPU starts processing a soft interrupt, it reserves the handler
> > > to prevent concurrent
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 07:40:26PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 09:05:24AM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > When a CPU starts processing a soft interrupt, it reserves the handler
> > to prevent concurrent execution. If the soft interrupt gets rescheduled
> > during
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 09:05:24AM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Here is a revised patch with a slightly altered approach.
>
> I have replaced the per-CPU queues with system-wide queues to make
> the code simpler.
I think that's fine to start with. We don't have many softintrs. We
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 02:23:57PM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 02:33:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 11:11:38 +
> > > From: Visa Hankala
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:11:09PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> >
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 02:33:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 11:11:38 +
> > From: Visa Hankala
> >
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:11:09PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > visa@ says I need to unlock softintr_dispatch() before I can
> > > unlock
Am Sat, May 22, 2021 at 02:33:47PM +0200 schrieb Mark Kettenis:
> > Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 11:11:38 +
> > From: Visa Hankala
> >
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:11:09PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > visa@ says I need to unlock softintr_dispatch() before I can
> > > unlock
> Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 11:11:38 +
> From: Visa Hankala
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:11:09PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > visa@ says I need to unlock softintr_dispatch() before I can
> > unlock softclock(), so let's do that.
> >
> > Additionally, when we call
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:11:09PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> visa@ says I need to unlock softintr_dispatch() before I can
> unlock softclock(), so let's do that.
>
> Additionally, when we call softintr_disestablish() we want to wait for
> the underlying softintr handle to finish
13 matches
Mail list logo
