Re: dc(1) exp improvements

2012-11-06 Thread Andres Perera
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote: Hi, And here's a diff to repair ^, whcih now produces correct results for things like (dc)0.1 _1 ^p or (bc)0.1 ^ -1 The diff is against very current, so beware. i've lightly tested it against gnu bc and it works

Re: dc(1) exp improvements

2012-11-06 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 04:57:20PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote: Hi, And here's a diff to repair ^, whcih now produces correct results for things like (dc)0.1 _1 ^p or (bc)0.1 ^ -1 The diff is against