On Mon, Mar 12, 2012, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/03/12 00:49, Daniel C. Sinclair wrote:
What do you think of making cksum output:
(SHA256) nonexistant.txt: MISSING
instead of FAILED and the extra output to stderr saying No such file
or directory?
I think this would be useful (in
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 03:26:44AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/03/12 00:49, Daniel C. Sinclair wrote:
What do you think of making cksum output:
(SHA256) nonexistant.txt: MISSING
instead of FAILED and the extra output to stderr
What do you think of making cksum output:
(SHA256) nonexistant.txt: MISSING
instead of FAILED and the extra output to stderr saying No such file
or directory?
This would make it easier to ignore the MISSING files but still see
those that FAILED the checksum.
Daniel
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at
On 2012/03/12 00:49, Daniel C. Sinclair wrote:
What do you think of making cksum output:
(SHA256) nonexistant.txt: MISSING
instead of FAILED and the extra output to stderr saying No such file
or directory?
I think this would be useful (in particular, for people downloading a set
of
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:16:20AM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
Hi
Is this really much more useful than 2/dev/null?
Yes, return code would be 0 if all present files match...
Landry
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:16:20AM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
Hi
Is this really much more useful than 2/dev/null?
Note the FAILED that vanish.
I'm not sure it's not bloat anyways.
I almost put or grep or so on in my original mail, but the point is
the same...
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:36:03AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:16:20AM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
Hi
Is this really much more useful than 2/dev/null?
Yes, return code would
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:48:17 +0100
From: Marc Espie es...@nerim.net
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:16:20AM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
Hi
Is this really much more useful than 2/dev/null?
Note the FAILED that vanish.
I'm not sure it's not bloat anyways.
None of the other BSDs
On 23 February 2012 08:46, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:48:17 +0100
From: Marc Espie es...@nerim.net
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:16:20AM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
Hi
Is this really much more useful than 2/dev/null?
Note the FAILED that
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:46:11AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:48:17 +0100
From: Marc Espie es...@nerim.net
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:16:20AM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
Hi
Is this really much more useful than 2/dev/null?
Note the FAILED that
10 matches
Mail list logo