Re: remove IF_PREPEND in src/sys/dev/pci, was Re: IFQ_PREPEND

> i thought le(4) was the worst. Of course not. le(4) is slow and has some quirks (and the earliest ones can't do multicast correctly), but at least they don't collapse into fetal position under load and don't need a reset to recover.

Re: remove IF_PREPEND in src/sys/dev/pci, was Re: IFQ_PREPEND

On 2015/11/08 10:45, Miod Vallat wrote: > > i thought le(4) was the worst. > > Of course not. le(4) is slow and has some quirks (and the earliest ones > can't do multicast correctly), but at least they don't collapse into fetal > position under load and don't need a reset to recover. I see you

Re: remove IF_PREPEND in src/sys/dev/pci, was Re: IFQ_PREPEND

On 11/08/15 01:06, David Gwynne wrote: On 8 Nov 2015, at 8:23 AM, Miod Vallat wrote: noone has a vr? You can't expect people to use the crappiest Ethernet chip ever designed. theyre in the alix, surely someone has those still. i thought le(4) was the worst. Finally

Re: remove IF_PREPEND in src/sys/dev/pci, was Re: IFQ_PREPEND

> On 6 Nov 2015, at 9:35 PM, David Gwynne wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 08:18:48AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: >> On 04/11/15(Wed) 10:39, David Gwynne wrote: >>> im working on making the interface send queue mpsafe. >>> >>> part of that involced deprecating the

Re: remove IF_PREPEND in src/sys/dev/pci, was Re: IFQ_PREPEND

> noone has a vr? You can't expect people to use the crappiest Ethernet chip ever designed.

Re: remove IF_PREPEND in src/sys/dev/pci, was Re: IFQ_PREPEND

> On 8 Nov 2015, at 8:23 AM, Miod Vallat wrote: > >> noone has a vr? > > You can't expect people to use the crappiest Ethernet chip ever > designed. theyre in the alix, surely someone has those still. i thought le(4) was the worst.