So I think the vr(4) diff has had a reasonable amount of testing;
any objections or ideally OKs to commit it?
I have also tested sis(4) on a PC Engines WRAP now; despite the
DP83815 datasheet indicating that Accept Long Packets
(SIS_RXCFG_RX_JABBER) should permit frames up to 2046 it seems
On 9 February 2013 16:27, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
So I think the vr(4) diff has had a reasonable amount of testing;
any objections or ideally OKs to commit it?
OK
I have also tested sis(4) on a PC Engines WRAP now; despite the
DP83815 datasheet indicating that Accept
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:41:12 +
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
This is extremely useful as it permits carrying stacked vlans
on Alix/net5501, and also permits carrying 1500 MTU packets within
pppoe(4) using the RFC4638 support.
So with 5.3 I can drop the max-mss 1452 on my
Appears not to break my alix...
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
At least the following vr(4) devices can be configured to permit
larger MTUs.
vr0 at pci0 dev 18 function 0 VIA RhineII-2 rev 0x51: irq 11, address
00:40:63:c0:5d:27
vr1 at pci2
On 2013/02/07 20:18, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:41:12 +
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
This is extremely useful as it permits carrying stacked vlans
on Alix/net5501, and also permits carrying 1500 MTU packets within
pppoe(4) using the RFC4638
