On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:24:01PM +0200, Josh wrote:
> thanks Otto for the dmesg.
>
> I'd like to get one B550 mobo as well. Which version of Gigabyte B550
> AORUS ELITE do you have exactly? ATX? mATX ?
> Most of them listed here[1] have either RLT8118 or RLT8125 chipset and
> re(4) doesn't
thanks Otto for the dmesg.
I'd like to get one B550 mobo as well. Which version of Gigabyte B550
AORUS ELITE do you have exactly? ATX? mATX ?
Most of them listed here[1] have either RLT8118 or RLT8125 chipset and
re(4) doesn't list them...
Can't find any reference to your model there[1] (RTL8168
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:54:59 +0100
> From: Otto Moerbeek
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:48:47AM -0500, Bryan Steele wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 03:08:42PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 07:41:20 -0500
> > > > From: Bryan Steele
> > > >
> > > > On Fri,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 03:08:42PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 07:41:20 -0500
> > From: Bryan Steele
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:26:08AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I got a new Ryzen machine, dmesg below. What I'm observing might be a
> >
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 07:41:20 -0500
> From: Bryan Steele
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:26:08AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got a new Ryzen machine, dmesg below. What I'm observing might be a
> > issue with hw.setperf.
> >
> > On startsup it shows:
> >
> >
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:21:41AM -0500, Bryan Steele wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:13:02PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2020/11/20 07:41, Bryan Steele wrote:
> > > At least on a desktop I'd suggest to leaved apmd(8) and not do any
> > > manual hw.setperf tweaking, you should have
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:13:02PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/11/20 07:41, Bryan Steele wrote:
> > At least on a desktop I'd suggest to leaved apmd(8) and not do any
> > manual hw.setperf tweaking, you should have adequate cooling
>
> the planet doesn't! :/
I'm only connered with
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:13:02PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/11/20 07:41, Bryan Steele wrote:
> > At least on a desktop I'd suggest to leaved apmd(8) and not do any
> > manual hw.setperf tweaking, you should have adequate cooling
>
> the planet doesn't! :/
hahaha
On 2020/11/20 07:41, Bryan Steele wrote:
> At least on a desktop I'd suggest to leaved apmd(8) and not do any
> manual hw.setperf tweaking, you should have adequate cooling
the planet doesn't! :/
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 07:41:22AM -0500, Bryan Steele wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:26:08AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got a new Ryzen machine, dmesg below. What I'm observing might be a
> > issue with hw.setperf.
> >
> > On startsup it shows:
> >
> >
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:26:08AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a new Ryzen machine, dmesg below. What I'm observing might be a
> issue with hw.setperf.
>
> On startsup it shows:
>
> hw.cpuspeed=3800
> hw.setperf=100
>
> If I lower hw.setperf to zero, the new state
Hi,
I got a new Ryzen machine, dmesg below. What I'm observing might be a
issue with hw.setperf.
On startsup it shows:
hw.cpuspeed=3800
hw.setperf=100
If I lower hw.setperf to zero, the new state is reflect immediately in
hw.cpuspeed:
hw.cpuspeed=2200
12 matches
Mail list logo
