On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 04:54:41PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> I like it, I think the heuristic is good enough.
usr.bin/nc/socks.c:328 for example also does it that way.
> OK florian@ or I take OKs to commit it myself ;)
OK kn
OK job@
On Sun, 17 Jun 2018 at 17:00, Florian Obser wrote:
> I like it, I think the heuristic is good enough.
>
> OK florian@ or I take OKs to commit it myself ;)
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 07:48:34PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is very naive patch for whois(1) which
I like it, I think the heuristic is good enough.
OK florian@ or I take OKs to commit it myself ;)
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 07:48:34PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is very naive patch for whois(1) which makes it work
> by default for IPv6 addresses. I went with very minimal
>
Hi,
Ping?
Initial email at https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=152684229010897=2
Regards,
Mikolaj
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 07:47:17AM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any comments?
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 07:48:34PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is very
Hi,
Any comments?
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 07:48:34PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is very naive patch for whois(1) which makes it work
> by default for IPv6 addresses. I went with very minimal
> approach here. If string contains colon, it's asumed to
> be IPv6 address.
Hi,
This is very naive patch for whois(1) which makes it work
by default for IPv6 addresses. I went with very minimal
approach here. If string contains colon, it's asumed to
be IPv6 address. Comments welcome.
Please CC me, as I'm not subscribed to the list.
Index: whois.c
