Re: Symbols.map for libfuse

2017-12-14 Thread Philip Guenther
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > Looks good to me, but I can't judge if you're removing too much, so > > maybe you should wait for an ok from helg@ as well. > > I have completed a partial ports bulk build with all libfuse consumers, > no visible fallout, with the updated

Re: Symbols.map for libfuse

2017-12-14 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
+cc Helg On Thu, Dec 14 2017, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas >> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:40:50 +0100 >> >> When reviewing helg@'s last diff I noticed a bunch of stuff that >> shouldn't be exported. So here's a diff similar to

Re: Symbols.map for libfuse

2017-12-14 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas > Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:40:50 +0100 > > When reviewing helg@'s last diff I noticed a bunch of stuff that > shouldn't be exported. So here's a diff similar to the recent > diffs for libutil and libkvm. To get the list of public symbols I

Symbols.map for libfuse

2017-12-14 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
When reviewing helg@'s last diff I noticed a bunch of stuff that shouldn't be exported. So here's a diff similar to the recent diffs for libutil and libkvm. To get the list of public symbols I used symbol visibility. The diff below only reduces the symbols list, it does not remove PLT entries