On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > Looks good to me, but I can't judge if you're removing too much, so
> > maybe you should wait for an ok from helg@ as well.
>
> I have completed a partial ports bulk build with all libfuse consumers,
> no visible fallout, with the updated
+cc Helg
On Thu, Dec 14 2017, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
>> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:40:50 +0100
>>
>> When reviewing helg@'s last diff I noticed a bunch of stuff that
>> shouldn't be exported. So here's a diff similar to
> From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:40:50 +0100
>
> When reviewing helg@'s last diff I noticed a bunch of stuff that
> shouldn't be exported. So here's a diff similar to the recent
> diffs for libutil and libkvm. To get the list of public symbols I
When reviewing helg@'s last diff I noticed a bunch of stuff that
shouldn't be exported. So here's a diff similar to the recent
diffs for libutil and libkvm. To get the list of public symbols I used
symbol visibility.
The diff below only reduces the symbols list, it does not remove PLT
entries