On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 06:26:47PM -0400, trondd wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > Ah, perhaps the change to disk behaviour wasn't reflected in calculations
> > then..
>
> I got it figured out.
>
> In the checkfs function, the 'eval $(stat...)' command stores a list of disk
> devices and
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Ah, perhaps the change to disk behaviour wasn't reflected in calculations
> then..
I got it figured out.
In the checkfs function, the 'eval $(stat...)' command stores a list of disk
devices and creates a variable named for each device to store the size of the
files in
On 2017/08/03 13:18, trondd wrote:
> On Thu, August 3, 2017 1:09 pm, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2017/08/03 09:55, trondd wrote:
> >> I noticed, when applying multiple patches, I would eventually be told I
> >> was out of space on /. There was about 60M free which is plenty for a
> >> kernel an
> I believe the clean ups were for data on disk. This problem seems to be
> with the variable value in memory. My free disk space isn't changing,
> just the free space syspatch thinks it needs.
>
> Also I am using the latest syspatch from CVS.
>
> # $OpenBSD: syspatch.sh,v 1.120 2017/08/02 05:5
On Thu, August 3, 2017 1:09 pm, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/08/03 09:55, trondd wrote:
>> I noticed, when applying multiple patches, I would eventually be told I
>> was out of space on /. There was about 60M free which is plenty for a
>> kernel and a copy. Rerunning syspatch would allow it
On 2017/08/03 09:55, trondd wrote:
> I noticed, when applying multiple patches, I would eventually be told I
> was out of space on /. There was about 60M free which is plenty for a
> kernel and a copy. Rerunning syspatch would allow it to continue for a
> another handful of patches.
>
> Mucking
I noticed, when applying multiple patches, I would eventually be told I
was out of space on /. There was about 60M free which is plenty for a
kernel and a copy. Rerunning syspatch would allow it to continue for a
another handful of patches.
Mucking about in checkfs(), it seems that the value of
