On 07/04/11 09:59, Henning Brauer wrote:
looks like you did everything right, except trhat you don't actually
have an ahc controller :)
Yes, Theo pointed that out within about 10 seconds of my posting the dmesg.
My brain got muddled between ahc and ahci.
Last call for preemptive testers, otherwise ahc(4) users will get to
test it in tree! :)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:52:40PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:33:53AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
Diff below cleans up ahc(4) to use scsi_link::bus instead of
(mis)using
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:33:53AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
Diff below cleans up ahc(4) to use scsi_link::bus instead of
(mis)using scsi_link::scsibus.
If you have an ahc(4) (particularly a dual-channel one), I'd
appreciate test reports + dmesg. (As long as your devices still show
up,
Diff below cleans up ahc(4) to use scsi_link::bus instead of
(mis)using scsi_link::scsibus.
If you have an ahc(4) (particularly a dual-channel one), I'd
appreciate test reports + dmesg. (As long as your devices still show
up, then it's working.)
Index: pci/ahc_pci.c
