On 25/04/14(Fri) 15:59, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 25/04/14(Fri) 15:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > [...] > > Regarding the tree, when Henning added ifa_add/del prior to its addition, > > he also used it for link-layer addresses. But ifa_ifwithaddr() was not > > dealing with link-layer addresses at that time! So when ifa_add/del > > got modified to add elements to the tree, all the lladdrs ended up in it. > > I'm talking bullshit here, it was already the first element of the list :) >
With r1.165 of net/route.c I believe that the tree is now ready for this. Somebody tried this diff? Does it break something in your setup? Ok?
