Re: Use of bread_cluster() in ffs_read()

2016-01-11 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 03/01/16(Sun) 23:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > I don't understand why the check for reading ahead one block has been > kept for clustering read when the Dynamic buffer cache got introduced. > > Since bread_cluster() replaces cluster_read() I believe this can go > away. Any ok? > Index:

Use of bread_cluster() in ffs_read()

2016-01-03 Thread Martin Pieuchot
I don't understand why the check for reading ahead one block has been kept for clustering read when the Dynamic buffer cache got introduced. Since bread_cluster() replaces cluster_read() I believe this can go away. Index: ufs/ffs/ffs_vnops.c