Yes please. ok dlg@.
> On 10 Nov 2022, at 10:10 pm, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> David (dlg@) asked me to shrink the scope of the change. The new diff
> introduces a mutex to pf_state and adjust pf_detach_state() to utilize the
> newly introduced mutex. I've also added
Hello,
David (dlg@) asked me to shrink the scope of the change. The new diff
introduces a mutex to pf_state and adjust pf_detach_state() to utilize the
newly introduced mutex. I've also added annotation to pf_state members. The
members with '?' needs our attention. We need to verify if they are
hello,
diff below adds a mutex to pf_state. It fixes a NULL pointer dereference panic
reported by Hrvoje sometime ago [1]. Besides adding a mutex to state the diff
addresses a race between pfsync and state purge thread. What happened in this
particular case was that state expired and its state
