Hi,
I have a eeepc 1001pxd with Attansic Technology L2C working
and this patch didn't break the nic.
One problem: very slow connectioncan I help?
try to make some tests?
Just an update: slow connection was a problem with my AP wifi.
So my device is working well.
Thank you, best
2011/5/16 Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org:
So far, only had reports from L1C and the new devices (which is
not the point of sending out this sort of diff). This is a fairly
large diff and changes behaviour for existing devices.
Has anyone with a currently-working L2C tested this to make
Since nobody with a working PCI_PRODUCT_ATTANSIC_L2C seems interested,
and the devices newly added in this diff are showing up more often
in submitted dmesg than the L2C version matched by the current driver,
I intend to commit this tomorrow unless there are objections.
On 2011/05/16 11:16,
So far, only had reports from L1C and the new devices (which is
not the point of sending out this sort of diff). This is a fairly
large diff and changes behaviour for existing devices.
Has anyone with a currently-working L2C tested this to make sure
it doesn't break their nic?
On 2011/05/01
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:32:47AM +0200, Gabriel Linder wrote:
I have an alc device too, and would like to fix it. Starting from
kevlo's diff I updated it some month ago to compile, and compared
FreeBSD driver to add some more things, finding some bugs in their
driver (reported and fixed in
On 05/02/11 14:23, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:02:41AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/02 01:16, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
I have acquired a netboot (packard bell
Edd Barrett wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:02:41AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/02 01:16, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s),
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 18:35 +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:21:16AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:24:28PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
Hi,
The following diff adds support for Atheros AR8151/AR8152 chipsets;
mostly from FreeBSD. It also fixes
On 2011/05/02 01:16, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this
NIC. Is
there an updated diff?
Yes I just took the 2 minutes
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:02:41AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/02 01:16, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this NIC.
Is
there an updated diff?
Yes I just took the 2 minutes it took to apply it and fix
the minor conflicts and linewrapping issue with the diff.
Untested beyond it builds.
Test
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this NIC.
Is
there an updated diff?
Yes I just took the 2 minutes it took to apply it and fix
the minor
I mean... my alc0 still works...
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
acam...@verlet.org wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this
NIC. Is
there an updated diff?
Yes I just took the 2 minutes it took to apply it and fix
the minor conflicts
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:16:55AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this
NIC. Is
there an updated diff?
Yes I just
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:24:28PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
Hi,
The following diff adds support for Atheros AR8151/AR8152 chipsets;
mostly from FreeBSD. It also fixes an issue i386/6311.
Tested on Acer AOD255E.
Is there an updated diff for this? It seems this never made it
into the tree.
On 01/25/11 11:24, Kevin Lo wrote:
Hi,
The following diff adds support for Atheros AR8151/AR8152 chipsets;
mostly from FreeBSD. It also fixes an issue i386/6311.
Tested on Acer AOD255E.
Tried yesterday on EeePC 1005PX, some comments inline.
@@ -515,6 +694,20 @@ alc_attach(struct device
See my comments inline.
Damien
| void
| -alc_aspm(struct alc_softc *sc)
| +alc_aspm(struct alc_softc *sc, int media)
| {
| uint32_t pmcfg;
| + uint16_t linkcfg;
|
| pmcfg = CSR_READ_4(sc, ALC_PM_CFG);
| + if ((sc-alc_flags (ALC_FLAG_APS | ALC_FLAG_PCIE)) ==
| +
18 matches
Mail list logo
