Re: allow xlock -dpms* values < 30 and > 0

2021-03-13 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 03:36:03PM +0100, Alex Raschi wrote: > Ping > > There was an extra space after 'noff', below is the updated patch. > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:11:21AM +0100, Alex Raschi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I noticed that xlock does not allow values between 30 and 0 for options > >

Re: allow xlock -dpms* values < 30 and > 0

2021-03-11 Thread Alex Raschi
Ping There was an extra space after 'noff', below is the updated patch. On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:11:21AM +0100, Alex Raschi wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that xlock does not allow values between 30 and 0 for options > -dpms{standby,suspend,off}, the man page suggests that all values >= 0 > are

allow xlock -dpms* values < 30 and > 0

2021-02-23 Thread Alex Raschi
Hi, I noticed that xlock does not allow values between 30 and 0 for options -dpms{standby,suspend,off}, the man page suggests that all values >= 0 are accepted. I use the blank mode and i would like to set a lower timeout so i made a patch to remove the limit. ok? Index: