On 14Jan2015 18:18, Theo de Raadt wrote:
On 14Jan2015 01:05, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38:49PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Philip Guenther
wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Mike Larkin
wrote:
>> > >> i386 is nex
On 14Jan2015 01:05, Theo de Raadt wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38:49PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> >> i386 is next, but that requires a PAE paging model and compatible C
> On 14Jan2015 01:05, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38:49PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Philip Guenther
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Mike Larkin
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> i386 is next, but that requir
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38:49PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Philip Guenther
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Mike Larkin
> > > wrote:
> > >> i386 is next, but that requires a PAE paging model and compatible CPU.
> > >> I've got the
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38:49PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> >> i386 is next, but that requires a PAE paging model and compatible CPU.
> >> I've got the PAE mode booting but i
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Mike Larkin wrote:
>> i386 is next, but that requires a PAE paging model and compatible CPU.
>> I've got the PAE mode booting but it's not ready for prime time yet.
Hmm, once PAE is working well, maybe w
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> i386 is next, but that requires a PAE paging model and compatible CPU.
> I've got the PAE mode booting but it's not ready for prime time yet.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 08:57:09PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Mike Larkin has been slow at informing the world, despite my prodding.
> Probably started working on something else cool...
>
> So.. I am going to take it upon myself to sing praise to him, and
> hopefully he'll let me off lightly!
>
On Jan 14, 2015 7:57 AM, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
>
> Mike Larkin has been slow at informing the world, despite my prodding.
> Probably started working on something else cool...
>
> So.. I am going to take it upon myself to sing praise to him, and
> hopefully he'll let me off lightly!
>
> Over the l
Mike Larkin has been slow at informing the world, despite my prodding.
Probably started working on something else cool...
So.. I am going to take it upon myself to sing praise to him, and
hopefully he'll let me off lightly!
Over the last two months Mike modified the amd64 kernel to follow the
W^X
10 matches
Mail list logo