On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 08:53:43PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 03:41:56PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:19:09AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2017/09/18 04:28, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > > > Do i really need to reference datasheets, or would
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 03:41:56PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:19:09AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2017/09/18 04:28, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > > Do i really need to reference datasheets, or would someone explain to me
> > > the value of this MSB robbing?
> >
> >
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:19:09AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/09/18 04:28, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > Do i really need to reference datasheets, or would someone explain to me
> > the value of this MSB robbing?
>
> I think, if you're proposing a change, you should explain why that
>
On 2017/09/18 04:28, Artturi Alm wrote:
> Do i really need to reference datasheets, or would someone explain to me
> the value of this MSB robbing?
I think, if you're proposing a change, you should explain why that
change should be made, rather than asking others to defend the current
situation..
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:23:35AM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at /sys/sys/timetc.h:
> 46 struct timecounter {
> 47 timecounter_get_t *tc_get_timecount;
> 48 /*
> 49 * This function reads the counter. It is not required to
>
Hi,
I was looking at /sys/sys/timetc.h:
46 struct timecounter {
47 timecounter_get_t *tc_get_timecount;
48 /*
49 * This function reads the counter. It is not required to
50 * mask any unimplemented bits out, as long as they are
