On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 05:45:43PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 02:12:45PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The arp mbuf queue la_mq has its own mutex, la_hold_total uses
> > atomic operations. So they don't need the global arp mutex.
> >
> > Pull them
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 02:12:45PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The arp mbuf queue la_mq has its own mutex, la_hold_total uses
> atomic operations. So they don't need the global arp mutex.
>
> Pull them out of arp_mtx blocks to make clear what the scope of
> arp_mtx protection is.
>
Hi,
The arp mbuf queue la_mq has its own mutex, la_hold_total uses
atomic operations. So they don't need the global arp mutex.
Pull them out of arp_mtx blocks to make clear what the scope of
arp_mtx protection is.
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet/if_ether.c