> On 26 Apr 2023, at 15:30, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>
> On 26.4.2023. 12:15, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:17:32AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:57:09PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Alexander
On 26.4.2023. 12:15, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:17:32AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:57:09PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
Hi,
Mutex arp_mtx protects the
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:17:32AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:57:09PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Mutex arp_mtx protects the llinfo_arp la_... fields. So kernel
> > >
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:57:09PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Mutex arp_mtx protects the llinfo_arp la_... fields. So kernel
> > lock is only needed for changing the route rt_flags.
> >
> > Of course there
On 25.4.2023. 22:57, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Mutex arp_mtx protects the llinfo_arp la_... fields. So kernel
>> lock is only needed for changing the route rt_flags.
>>
>> Of course there is a race between checking
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mutex arp_mtx protects the llinfo_arp la_... fields. So kernel
> lock is only needed for changing the route rt_flags.
>
> Of course there is a race between checking and setting rt_flags.
> But the other checks of the
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:15:49PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> A clearer version of this diff would use two new bools `expired' and `reject'
> rather than a ternary `reject', but that can be polished and retested later.
Or simpler even, use new `expired' and existing `refresh'.
Refresh and
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mutex arp_mtx protects the llinfo_arp la_... fields. So kernel
> lock is only needed for changing the route rt_flags.
>
> Of course there is a race between checking and setting rt_flags.
> But the other checks of the
Hi,
Mutex arp_mtx protects the llinfo_arp la_... fields. So kernel
lock is only needed for changing the route rt_flags.
Of course there is a race between checking and setting rt_flags.
But the other checks of the RTF_REJECT flags were without kernel
lock before. This does not cause trouble,
