Re: bridge(4) and ether_input_mbuf()

2015-05-02 Thread mxb
Applied. I don’t see any regressions so far. I use bridge+vether. //mxb On 28 apr 2015, at 23:06, Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org wrote: On 21/04/15(Tue) 12:35, Martin Pieuchot wrote: This diff adds the necessary glue to bridge(4) to be able to convert other pseudo-drivers to if_input().

Re: bridge(4) and ether_input_mbuf()

2015-04-28 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 21/04/15(Tue) 12:35, Martin Pieuchot wrote: This diff adds the necessary glue to bridge(4) to be able to convert other pseudo-drivers to if_input(). This will also help bridge(4)'s own conversion. Since bridge_input() already returns a mbuf, I believe this change is less error prone

bridge(4) and ether_input_mbuf()

2015-04-21 Thread Martin Pieuchot
This diff adds the necessary glue to bridge(4) to be able to convert other pseudo-drivers to if_input(). This will also help bridge(4)'s own conversion. Since bridge_input() already returns a mbuf, I believe this change is less error prone than the carp(4) one. But I appreciate reviews, tests