Re: clang: ignore -fno-force-addr

2017-04-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/04/26 00:47, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > "Ted Unangst" writes: > > > Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > >> > >> clang already recognizes (and ignores) -fforce-addr but errors out > >> on -fno-force-addr. This breaks the build of ports/databases/qdbm: > >> >

Re: clang: ignore -fno-force-addr

2017-04-25 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
"Ted Unangst" writes: > Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: >> >> clang already recognizes (and ignores) -fforce-addr but errors out >> on -fno-force-addr. This breaks the build of ports/databases/qdbm: >> >> >>

Re: clang: ignore -fno-force-addr

2017-04-21 Thread Ted Unangst
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > clang already recognizes (and ignores) -fforce-addr but errors out > on -fno-force-addr. This breaks the build of ports/databases/qdbm: > > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/amd64-clang/2017-04-14/databases/qdbm.log > > Fixing the port is easy, but

Re: clang: ignore -fno-force-addr

2017-04-19 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:30:43AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote: > In general, if -fdo-something is supported I think it should also > accept -fno-do-something. Since this was seen in the wild, patching > llvm makes the most sense. Bonus points if you can get it upstreamed. The positive forms of

Re: clang: ignore -fno-force-addr

2017-04-19 Thread Todd C. Miller
In general, if -fdo-something is supported I think it should also accept -fno-do-something. Since this was seen in the wild, patching llvm makes the most sense. Bonus points if you can get it upstreamed. - todd

clang: ignore -fno-force-addr

2017-04-19 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
clang already recognizes (and ignores) -fforce-addr but errors out on -fno-force-addr. This breaks the build of ports/databases/qdbm: http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/amd64-clang/2017-04-14/databases/qdbm.log Fixing the port is easy, but so is ignoring -fno-force-addr. -fno-force-addr