Re: dig(1) doesn't play well with rebound(8)

2017-06-29 Thread Rui Ribeiro
nslookup also seems to get a little upset with rebound. On 29 June 2017 at 13:13, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > I played with it but kept getting segfaults. So moved my version with a > command line option to /use/local. I guess Im the only person using rebound > and dig. >

Re: dig(1) doesn't play well with rebound(8)

2017-06-29 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
I played with it but kept getting segfaults. So moved my version with a command line option to /use/local. I guess Im the only person using rebound and dig. ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On Jun 29, 2017, 4:13 AM, at 4:13 AM, Theo Buehler wrote: >On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 08:08:08AM

Re: dig(1) doesn't play well with rebound(8)

2017-06-29 Thread Theo Buehler
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 08:08:08AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > This may not be the best way to handle this, but it was the first fix to > > come to mind. Not sure where to put this in the manual or if its even > > worth documenting. Thoughts? > > I think this is a

Re: dig(1) doesn't play well with rebound(8)

2017-05-26 Thread Todd C. Miller
On Fri, 26 May 2017 08:08:08 -0400, "Ted Unangst" wrote: > Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > This may not be the best way to handle this, but it was the first fix to > > come to mind. Not sure where to put this in the manual or if its even > > worth documenting. Thoughts? > > I think this is a

Re: dig(1) doesn't play well with rebound(8)

2017-05-26 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
Sounds good to me. Just started using rebound and thought it would be good to use dig to prepopulate the cache. Also noticed host(1) has the same problem but was waiting for a response to dig first. Edgar ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On May 26, 2017, 7:34 AM, at 7:34 AM, Ted Unangst

Re: dig(1) doesn't play well with rebound(8)

2017-05-26 Thread Ted Unangst
Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > This may not be the best way to handle this, but it was the first fix to > come to mind. Not sure where to put this in the manual or if its even > worth documenting. Thoughts? I think this is a better fix. the user shouldn't worry about such things. at least until a

Re: dig(1) doesn't play well with rebound(8)

2017-05-21 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
On 05/21/17 14:53, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: This may not be the best way to handle this, but it was the first fix to come to mind. Not sure where to put this in the manual or if its even worth documenting. Thoughts? Thanks, Edgar Well it worked when invoked as

dig(1) doesn't play well with rebound(8)

2017-05-21 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
This may not be the best way to handle this, but it was the first fix to come to mind. Not sure where to put this in the manual or if its even worth documenting. Thoughts? Thanks, Edgar Index: dig.c === RCS file: