Re: dig vs ipv6 (scoped) addresses

2020-12-20 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:48:01AM +0100, Florian Obser wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:15:16PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > as noted on misc dig does not like to talk to local link addresses. > > This fixes that case. While investigating I also found another bug: > >

Re: dig vs ipv6 (scoped) addresses

2020-12-20 Thread Florian Obser
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:15:16PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Hi, > > as noted on misc dig does not like to talk to local link addresses. > This fixes that case. While investigating I also found another bug: Thanks for looking into this. Looks like I got distracted while ripping out

Re: dig vs ipv6 (scoped) addresses

2020-12-19 Thread Jordan Geoghegan
On 12/18/20 5:04 PM, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: On 12/17/20 3:15 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: Hi, as noted on misc dig does not like to talk to local link addresses. This fixes that case. While investigating I also found another bug: selecting v6 or v4 addresses only from resolv.conf via the -4

Re: dig vs ipv6 (scoped) addresses

2020-12-18 Thread Jordan Geoghegan
On 12/17/20 3:15 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: Hi, as noted on misc dig does not like to talk to local link addresses. This fixes that case. While investigating I also found another bug: selecting v6 or v4 addresses only from resolv.conf via the -4 or -6 command line argument does not work as

dig vs ipv6 (scoped) addresses

2020-12-17 Thread Otto Moerbeek
Hi, as noted on misc dig does not like to talk to local link addresses. This fixes that case. While investigating I also found another bug: selecting v6 or v4 addresses only from resolv.conf via the -4 or -6 command line argument does not work as expected. This fixes both. I did not test binding