On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 09:46:58AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just realized my suggestion [1] to lteo@ was not complete. The single
> atomic_cas() used as I've suggested is not sufficient measure. The code
> should also do a non-atomic test to check, whether the rule is no
Hello,
I've just realized my suggestion [1] to lteo@ was not complete. The single
atomic_cas() used as I've suggested is not sufficient measure. The code
should also do a non-atomic test to check, whether the rule is not expired yet.
the non-atomic check deals with scenario, where competing threa
