Re: fork(2), PT_ATTACH & SIGTRAP

2021-03-22 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 16:56:47 +0100 > From: Martin Pieuchot > > On 21/03/21(Sun) 13:42, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 13:10:17 +0100 > > > From: Martin Pieuchot > > > > > > On SP systems, like bluhm@'s armv7 regression machine, the kern/ptrace2 > > > test is failing due

Re: fork(2), PT_ATTACH & SIGTRAP

2021-03-21 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 21/03/21(Sun) 13:42, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 13:10:17 +0100 > > From: Martin Pieuchot > > > > On SP systems, like bluhm@'s armv7 regression machine, the kern/ptrace2 > > test is failing due to a subtle behavior. Diff below makes it pass. > > > >

Re: fork(2), PT_ATTACH & SIGTRAP

2021-03-21 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 13:10:17 +0100 > From: Martin Pieuchot > > On SP systems, like bluhm@'s armv7 regression machine, the kern/ptrace2 > test is failing due to a subtle behavior. Diff below makes it pass. > >

fork(2), PT_ATTACH & SIGTRAP

2021-03-20 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On SP systems, like bluhm@'s armv7 regression machine, the kern/ptrace2 test is failing due to a subtle behavior. Diff below makes it pass. http://bluhm.genua.de/regress/results/2021-03-19T15%3A17%3A02Z/logs/sys/kern/ptrace2/make.log The failing test does a fork(2) and the parent issues a