On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 04:00:42PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 03:50:47PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 03:01:26PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > When I added ibuf_get_fd() the idea was to make sure that ibuf_free() will
> > > close any fd
> Thanks. Do we have a list of ports that use ibuf / imsg?
Here's a list obtained from the nm output of all ports by grepping for
'^ibuf_.* U' and '^imsg_.* U', respectively, then weeding out the
obvious false positives::
ibuf:
mail/opensmtpd-extras,-main
net/ladvd
imsg:
audio/amused
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 04:00:42PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 03:50:47PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 03:01:26PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > When I added ibuf_get_fd() the idea was to make sure that ibuf_free() will
> > > close any fd
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 03:50:47PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 03:01:26PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > When I added ibuf_get_fd() the idea was to make sure that ibuf_free() will
> > close any fd still on the buffer. This way even if a fd is unexpectedly
> > passed
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 03:01:26PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> When I added ibuf_get_fd() the idea was to make sure that ibuf_free() will
> close any fd still on the buffer. This way even if a fd is unexpectedly
> passed nothing will happen.
>
> That code was disabled at start because userland
When I added ibuf_get_fd() the idea was to make sure that ibuf_free() will
close any fd still on the buffer. This way even if a fd is unexpectedly
passed nothing will happen.
That code was disabled at start because userland was not fully ready. In
particular rpki-client did not handle that well.
