Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-11-01 Thread Josh
Hi Mark, Just tried amd64 snapshot (1st Nov) on Intel NUC5i7RYH and building world from source (updated around 4PM UTC, 1st Nov). While I do not get any kernel panic or crash as others may have faced, the behavior of some programs such as firefox, dillo under X (startx with default install) will

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-11-01 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister
I somehow missed this thread before posting to misc@. I’m using the Nov 1 snapshot with an OpenBSD-only EFI install on the internal SSD of a 2013 MacBook Air and inteldrm(4) does attach but immediately after the display is corrupted. I can start X just fine but the corruption remains. I can quit

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-11-01 Thread Jan Stary
On Oct 26 13:31:14, h...@stare.cz wrote: > On Oct 24 23:48:01, mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote: > > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > > intagp(4) a child of inteldrm(4). Ultimately I'd like

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-26 Thread YASUOKA Masahiko
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 23:48:01 +0200 (CEST) Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > intagp(4) a child of inteldrm(4). Ultimately I'd like to integrate

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-26 Thread Jan Stary
On Oct 24 23:48:01, mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote: > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > intagp(4) a child of inteldrm(4). Ultimately I'd like to integrate > intagp(4) into inteldrm(4), but

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > intagp(4) a child of inteldrm(4). Ultimately I'd like to integrate >

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > intagp(4) a child of inteldrm(4). Ultimately I'd like to integrate > intagp(4) into

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > intagp(4) a child of inteldrm(4). Ultimately I'd like to integrate > intagp(4) into

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 09:38:14PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 15:51:54 +1100 > > From: Jonathan Gray > > > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > >

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 15:51:54 +1100 > From: Jonathan Gray > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > >

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > intagp(4) a child of inteldrm(4). Ultimately I'd like to integrate > intagp(4) into

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Norman Golisz
On Sat Oct 24 2015 23:48, Mark Kettenis wrote: > This diff needs to be tested on a wide range of hardware. So if you > have a machine with inteldrm(4), please give it a shot. I'm > particularly interested in testing on an x40. No problems on my Thinkpad T400 (also running X11). OpenBSD

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Gregor Best
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 08:20:50AM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: > [...] > This looks like the result of applying the diff but not running config > [...] Thanks for the clue bat. It's working fine on a Thinkpad T400. -- Gregor

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 08:20:50AM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Gregor Best wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> [...] > >> This diff needs to be tested on a wide range of hardware.

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 23:48:01 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > intagp(4) a child of inteldrm(4). Ultimately I'd like to

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Ralf Horstmann
* Jonathan Gray [2015-10-25 05:51]: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > > intagp(4) a child of

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 15:50:51 +0100 > From: Stefan Sperling > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > >

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-25 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > intagp(4) a child of inteldrm(4). Ultimately I'd like to integrate > intagp(4) into

inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-24 Thread Mark Kettenis
The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make intagp(4) a child of inteldrm(4). Ultimately I'd like to integrate intagp(4) into inteldrm(4), but that's going to be a bit more work. This diff is needed to

Re: inteldrm(4) diff that needs testing

2015-10-24 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below makes inteldrm(4) attach directly to pci(4) instead of > vga(1). Because inteldrm(4) depends on intagp(4), this also make > intagp(4) a child of inteldrm(4). Ultimately I'd like to integrate > intagp(4) into