Re: ksh: add support for HISTCONTROL ignorespace & ignoredups

On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 18:50:26 +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30 2017, "Todd C. Miller" wrote: > > Looks good to me. Do we want to document this as an extension in > > the manual? We're not very good about documenting extensions to > > traditional

Re: ksh: add support for HISTCONTROL ignorespace & ignoredups

On Wed, Aug 30 2017, "Todd C. Miller" wrote: > Looks good to me. Do we want to document this as an extension in > the manual? We're not very good about documenting extensions to > traditional ksh behavior. I'm not against this but I'm not thrilled either. If anyone

Re: ksh: add support for HISTCONTROL ignorespace & ignoredups

Looks good to me. Do we want to document this as an extension in the manual? We're not very good about documenting extensions to traditional ksh behavior. - todd

Re: ksh: add support for HISTCONTROL ignorespace & ignoredups

Yes, please! Il 30 agosto 2017 13:04:02 CEST, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas ha scritto: > >This implements a feature I miss from bash. What I care about: >- not clog the history with repeated commands >- easily prevent some commands to go in the history > >The diff below implements

Re: ksh: add support for HISTCONTROL ignorespace & ignoredups

Hi Jeremie, Am 30.08.2017 13:04 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: This implements a feature I miss from bash. What I care about: - not clog the history with repeated commands - easily prevent some commands to go in the history The diff below implements HISTCONTROL for this, user-facing

ksh: add support for HISTCONTROL ignorespace & ignoredups

This implements a feature I miss from bash. What I care about: - not clog the history with repeated commands - easily prevent some commands to go in the history The diff below implements HISTCONTROL for this, user-facing behavior based on bash. The default ksh behavior doesn't change. I did