On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:31:36AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:10:58PM -0400, Jared Yanovich wrote:
>
> > + If first and last are both omitted, the previous 16 commands shall
> > be listed or the previous single command shall be edited (based on the
> > -l opt
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:10:58PM -0400, Jared Yanovich wrote:
> + If first and last are both omitted, the previous 16 commands shall
> be listed or the previous single command shall be edited (based on the
> -l option).
>
> that kind of suggests that the "fc -l" producing those "previous
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:10:58PM -0400, Jared Yanovich wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 07:41:08PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> > the only thing i have to compare it with is bash:
>
> By no means comprehensive but:
>
> these appear to not include the current command:
> zsh
>
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 07:41:08PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> the only thing i have to compare it with is bash:
By no means comprehensive but:
these appear to not include the current command:
zsh
FreeBSD ash
these appear to include the current command:
AT&T k
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 07:41:08PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> hi!
>
> notice how ksh's history command (fc -l) does not list the last typed history
> command:
>
> $ ls
> $ date
> Wed Aug 13 19:29:59 BST 2014
> $ history
> 1 ls
> 2 date
>
> the
hi!
notice how ksh's history command (fc -l) does not list the last typed history
command:
$ ls
$ date
Wed Aug 13 19:29:59 BST 2014
$ history
1 ls
2 date
the only thing i have to compare it with is bash:
bash-4.3$ ls
b
