OK bcook@, looks fine for portable too.
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 11:02 AM, Tom Cosgrove
> wrote:
>
Miod Vallat 4-Nov-16 08:53 >>>
>>
>> I386_ONLY was used to prefer a different assembler sequence in the
>> sha512 code, which would be faster on 80386
>>> Miod Vallat 4-Nov-16 08:53 >>>
>
> I386_ONLY was used to prefer a different assembler sequence in the
> sha512 code, which would be faster on 80386 processors, but slower on
> 80486 and above.
>
> This code path has never been enabled, and there are actually no plans
> to make libcrypto
I386_ONLY was used to prefer a different assembler sequence in the
sha512 code, which would be faster on 80386 processors, but slower on
80486 and above.
This code path has never been enabled, and there are actually no plans
to make libcrypto friendlier to genuine 80386 chips, so why bother