On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:24:01AM +0200, Lari Rasku wrote:
> Been running a base linked against this on amd64 since the 24th.
> No new problems observed. If there's anything specific I can test
> do tell.
Thanks for testing. I've committed this. Soon a followup will come.
-Otto
Been running a base linked against this on amd64 since the 24th.
No new problems observed. If there's anything specific I can test
do tell.
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 03:39:53PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Largely cleanup and small optimizations:
>
> - remove over-initializaition of chunks: canary is set only once,
> other fields only as-needed.
> - remember position of last free bit in chunk_info, so we can start at
> the pr
Hi,
Largely cleanup and small optimizations:
- remove over-initializaition of chunks: canary is set only once,
other fields only as-needed.
- remember position of last free bit in chunk_info, so we can start at
the proper spot the next time. To be able to do this a field was added
to chunk_info.