On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 06:41:09PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:53:31 +0200
> > From: Otto Moerbeek
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > A local test and jca@ confirm the special casing isn't needed anymore.
> >
> > Two things:
> >
> > - This could do with a ports bulk build to
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 08:31:07PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 05:53:31PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A local test and jca@ confirm the special casing isn't needed anymore.
> >
> > Two things:
> >
> > - This could do with a ports bulk build to find other
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 05:53:31PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A local test and jca@ confirm the special casing isn't needed anymore.
>
> Two things:
>
> - This could do with a ports bulk build to find other offenders
I have started an amd64 bulk that includes this diff. Will report
> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:53:31 +0200
> From: Otto Moerbeek
>
> Hi,
>
> A local test and jca@ confirm the special casing isn't needed anymore.
>
> Two things:
>
> - This could do with a ports bulk build to find other offenders
>
> - Would this require a libc bump?
Unless I'm mistaken,
Hi,
A local test and jca@ confirm the special casing isn't needed anymore.
Two things:
- This could do with a ports bulk build to find other offenders
- Would this require a libc bump?
-Otto
Index: hidden/stdlib.h
===
