On 12 April 2016 at 21:49, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:37:42PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> Marc Espie wrote:
>> > Parentheses are okay in urls, so I see no reason why:
>> >
>> > man.openbsd.org/carp(4)
>> >
>> > shouldn't work.
>>
>> There are an astounding number of text to
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:50:44PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Exactly what i did. It already works. Try it.
Ah, but the .Xr inside the renderer html still use the old ?query syntax,
so it is not exactly obvious this is going to work!
Hi,
Ted Unangst wrote on Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:37:42PM -0400:
> Marc Espie wrote:
>> I think that in this day and age, the query? syntax is cumbersome
I fully agree, the query syntax is obsolete for deep linking.
It is supported for the HTML form frontend and for backward
compatibility only.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:37:42PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Marc Espie wrote:
> > Parentheses are okay in urls, so I see no reason why:
> >
> > man.openbsd.org/carp(4)
> >
> > shouldn't work.
>
> There are an astounding number of text to html URL parsers/highlighters that
> cannot quite handl
Marc Espie wrote:
> Parentheses are okay in urls, so I see no reason why:
>
> man.openbsd.org/carp(4)
>
> shouldn't work.
There are an astounding number of text to html URL parsers/highlighters that
cannot quite handle parentheses. That's not our problem, but instead of trying
to boil the ocean,
Hardcoding stuff makes no sense.
There are enough variations out there.
Default + config probably.
As far as putting links in the faq, does it make sense to let man resolve
stuff instead of providing the redirection link directly ?
Actually, I think that in this day and age, the query? syntax is
Hi Mike,
Mike Belopuhov wrote on Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:41:16PM +0200:
> why is 3p still on the "sections" list in the fs_search?
> Just a lookup optimization?
No. The purpose of the function fs_search() is not optimization,
but fallback. If the requested manual is found in a database, that
v
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 20:27 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Mike Belopuhov wrote on Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:01:23PM +0200:
>
> > IMO it's a very bad idea to hardcode "3p/" like that.
> > Aren't there packages using other funny section names?
>
> Packages are in a different manual tr
Hi Mike,
Mike Belopuhov wrote on Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:01:23PM +0200:
> IMO it's a very bad idea to hardcode "3p/" like that.
> Aren't there packages using other funny section names?
Packages are in a different manual tree /usr/local/man/, which gets
lower priority than /usr/share/man/ in the
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 19:14 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> [moved to tech@, source-changes is not ideal for discussions]
>
> Marc Espie wrote on Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:44:34PM +0200:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:24:40PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:36:09PM +0200,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 07:14:16PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> [moved to tech@, source-changes is not ideal for discussions]
>
> Marc Espie wrote on Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:44:34PM +0200:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:24:40PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:36:09PM +
[moved to tech@, source-changes is not ideal for discussions]
Marc Espie wrote on Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:44:34PM +0200:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:24:40PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:36:09PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:18:33PM +1000, Jon
12 matches
Mail list logo
