On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:08:39PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:07:07AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:42:50PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > mbg(4) is among the few remaining drivers using tsleep(9).
> > >
> > > In a few
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:07:07AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:42:50PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > mbg(4) is among the few remaining drivers using tsleep(9).
> >
> > In a few spots, when the kernel is not cold, the driver will spin for
> > up to 1/10
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:42:50PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> mbg(4) is among the few remaining drivers using tsleep(9).
>
> In a few spots, when the kernel is not cold, the driver will spin for
> up to 1/10 seconds waiting for the MBG_BUSY flag to go low.
>
> We can approximate this
Hi,
mbg(4) is among the few remaining drivers using tsleep(9).
In a few spots, when the kernel is not cold, the driver will spin for
up to 1/10 seconds waiting for the MBG_BUSY flag to go low.
We can approximate this behavior by spinning 10 times and sleeping 10
milliseconds each iteration. 10
