Re: mg docs ownership

2016-09-11 Thread Florian Obser
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:15:28PM +, Mark Lumsden wrote: > > Maybe we should just not install it? Mark? > > A couple of years ago when the tutorial started being installed there > were no dissenting voices, so unless there are objections, I'd carry > on doing that. And Martin's diff makes sen

Re: mg docs ownership

2016-09-11 Thread Mark Lumsden
> Maybe we should just not install it? Mark? A couple of years ago when the tutorial started being installed there were no dissenting voices, so unless there are objections, I'd carry on doing that. And Martin's diff makes sense I think. Mark

Re: mg docs ownership

2016-09-10 Thread Florian Obser
Maybe we should just not install it? Mark? On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 07:47:30PM +0200, Martin Natano wrote: > We should be explicit about owner/group when using install, so this also > works correctly with noperm. Ok? > > natano > > > Index: usr.bin/mg/Makefile > =

mg docs ownership

2016-09-10 Thread Martin Natano
We should be explicit about owner/group when using install, so this also works correctly with noperm. Ok? natano Index: usr.bin/mg/Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.31 diff -u -p -r1.31 Make