Re: missing warning in wireguard manual page

2022-07-25 Thread Philip Guenther
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 7:20 AM Theo de Raadt wrote: > I've been watching conversation on a mailing list, and it leads me to > wonder if we should inform the userbase better. > Too true. Certification *is* the key thing that protects users, not careful, well engineered designs. We should be

Re: missing warning in wireguard manual page

2022-07-25 Thread Crystal Kolipe
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:19:25AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > +number generators, so the security properties cannot be gauranteed. s/gauranteed/guaranteed Otherwise OK.

Re: missing warning in wireguard manual page

2022-07-25 Thread Tom Smyth
For what It is worth I think the proposed ammendment makes sense. On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 17:23, Theo de Raadt wrote: > I've been watching conversation on a mailing list, and it leads me to > wonder if we should inform the userbase better. > > > Index: wg.4 >

missing warning in wireguard manual page

2022-07-25 Thread Theo de Raadt
I've been watching conversation on a mailing list, and it leads me to wonder if we should inform the userbase better. Index: wg.4 === RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/wg.4,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.10 wg.4 --- wg.4