On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 07:22:47PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:39:07PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
Apparently, nobody cares about fat packages.
Not surprisingly, killing that code simplifies a few things.
Especially since the necessity of passing arch around was
Apparently, nobody cares about fat packages.
Not surprisingly, killing that code simplifies a few things.
Especially since the necessity of passing arch around was only due to
the possibility of fat packages...
Index: package.5
===
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:39:07PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
Apparently, nobody cares about fat packages.
Not surprisingly, killing that code simplifies a few things.
Especially since the necessity of passing arch around was only due to
the possibility of fat packages...
I don't see the
