That's ok.. every newbie fucks that up the first time when sending
out diffs.
Those of us that commit generally speak only -current. Now you know :)
> Oh, someone pointed the possible problem out to me:
> I'm running OpenBSD 5.9 instead of current.
Oh, someone pointed the possible problem out to me:
I'm running OpenBSD 5.9 instead of current.
Sorry.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Andras Farkas wrote:
>> Andras - your original diff does not apply to -current as mailed, and
>> you also have a bug when the -v option is used, because you end
Andras - your original diff does not apply to -current as mailed, and
you also have a bug when the -v option is used, because you end up
putting port names in the portlist array instead of numbers and
so -v doesn't work right.
Try this instead:
Thank you, I was trying to look for bugs and still
>
> I certainly like to use names wherever i can.
>
Allright allright.. so openssl s_client does actually do it.. So benno,
you and philip have guilted me into it..
Andras - your original diff does not apply to -current as mailed, and
you also have a bug when the -v option is used, because you
Bob Beck(b...@openbsd.org) on 2016.05.31 23:25:47 -0600:
> Honestly, I care little about the incompatibility because we are
> already different.
>
> However I do not think this is any "easier" - I never use
> /etc/services because frankly I can't
> predict what other non-openbsd systems will have
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Theo de Raadt
> wrote:
> >> This diff allows users to use the name of a service in /etc/services
> >> instead of a port number when using netcat. Hopefully, this will make
> >> using netcat easier for some users.
> >
> > I don't see how it makes it easier. The
Honestly, I care little about the incompatibility because we are
already different.
However I do not think this is any "easier" - I never use
/etc/services because frankly I can't
predict what other non-openbsd systems will have in it.
even openssl s_client doens't add code complexity to do this
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> This diff allows users to use the name of a service in /etc/services
>> instead of a port number when using netcat. Hopefully, this will make
>> using netcat easier for some users.
>
> I don't see how it makes it easier. There are a number
Ah, okay.
> I don't see how it makes it easier. There are a number of netcat
> versions out there, mostly trying to be somewhat compatible. On a
> whim, this introduces an incompatibility --> scripts become less
> portable.
> This diff allows users to use the name of a service in /etc/services
> instead of a port number when using netcat. Hopefully, this will make
> using netcat easier for some users.
I don't see how it makes it easier. There are a number of netcat
versions out there, mostly trying to be somewhat
Evening!
This diff allows users to use the name of a service in /etc/services
instead of a port number when using netcat. Hopefully, this will make
using netcat easier for some users.
? nc
Index: nc.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.b
11 matches
Mail list logo
