Hi,
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 21:32:29 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:00:13PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> But I think we should keep the part since it is needed when adding a
>> tunneling protocol which is not supported by pipex, or running npppd
>> on anoth
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:00:13PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Hi
>
> ...
>
> But I think we should keep the part since it is needed when adding a
> tunneling protocol which is not supported by pipex, or running npppd
> on another OS.
>
> >> If having "pipex yes/no" configuration is mislead
I'm sorry for sending 2 mails. First one was a draft. Please read second one.
Hi
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:30:43 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:40:19PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:35:05 +0300
>> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> > While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwakeup() to KNOTE(9), I
>> > found npp
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:30:43 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:40:19PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:35:05 +0300
>> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> > While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwakeup() to KNOTE(9), I
>> > found npppd(8
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:40:19PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:35:05 +0300
> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwakeup() to KNOTE(9), I
> > found npppd(8) doesn't create pppx interface with "pipex no" in
> > npppd.conf, bu
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:35:05 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwakeup() to KNOTE(9), I
> found npppd(8) doesn't create pppx interface with "pipex no" in
> npppd.conf, but successfully connects the client. So packets don't flow.
> However, the pppac(
Hi,
While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwakeup() to KNOTE(9), I
found npppd(8) doesn't create pppx interface with "pipex no" in
npppd.conf, but successfully connects the client. So packets don't flow.
However, the pppac(4) has no this problem, because corresponding pppac
interface always