On 24/12/16(Sat) 00:23, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it is better to check for a valid route than for an existing
> route in pf route-to. So call rtisvalid() now. I want to have
> pf_route() and pf_route6() as simmilar as possible so I can merge
> them some day. As rtalloc() has to
Hi,
I think it is better to check for a valid route than for an existing
route in pf route-to. So call rtisvalid() now. I want to have
pf_route() and pf_route6() as simmilar as possible so I can merge
them some day. As rtalloc() has to stay after embeding the v6
scope, I have moved it down in t
