Re: pfi_kif leaks for PBR rules

2015-04-09 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On 8 April 2015 at 19:16, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 12:06 +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: >> Hello, >> >> while testing PBR on Solaris we found out the pfi_kif instances >> are not removed from pfi_ifs table. We took a look at crashdump >> and have seen pfik_route counter a

Re: pfi_kif leaks for PBR rules

2015-04-08 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 12:06 +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > Hello, > > while testing PBR on Solaris we found out the pfi_kif instances > are not removed from pfi_ifs table. We took a look at crashdump > and have seen pfik_route counter at those object is still > non-zero, while all rules wer

Re: pfi_kif leaks for PBR rules

2015-04-05 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Alexandr Nedvedicky [alexandr.nedvedi...@oracle.com] wrote: > > is missing at pfr_destroy_kentry(). We created patch against OpenBSD CURRENT. > We have no OpenBSD boxes around, where we could verify our fix. > You are aware that OpenBSD supports both host and guest roles of Sparc system virtuali

pfi_kif leaks for PBR rules

2015-04-05 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
Hello, while testing PBR on Solaris we found out the pfi_kif instances are not removed from pfi_ifs table. We took a look at crashdump and have seen pfik_route counter at those object is still non-zero, while all rules were gone. looking at sources we can see the 'pfik_route' (PFI_KIF_REF_ROUTE)