Re: piixpm(4) on ATI SBx00

2020-01-30 Thread Karel Gardas
On 1/22/20 5:25 AM, Ted Unangst wrote: Karel Gardas wrote: On 1/21/20 2:33 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote: Please test this since I can't test this properly at the moment. Sorry for delay with testing. Used today current to update and dmesg and diff of last fix and current dmesg are attached.

Re: piixpm(4) on ATI SBx00

2020-01-21 Thread Ted Unangst
Karel Gardas wrote: > > > On 1/21/20 2:33 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > Please test this since I can't test this properly at the moment. > > Would like to, but all hunks fail on today current: it's been committed.

Re: piixpm(4) on ATI SBx00

2020-01-21 Thread Karel Gardas
On 1/21/20 2:33 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote: Please test this since I can't test this properly at the moment. Would like to, but all hunks fail on today current: solo$ patch < /tmp/piixpm.patch Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was:

Re: piixpm(4) on ATI SBx00

2020-01-20 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 12:44:59PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 09:27:50AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > In -current I added support for the additional I2C busses on piixpm(4) > > now I noticed that on my old AMD system the I2C bus seems to either > > connect all those 4

Re: piixpm(4) on ATI SBx00

2020-01-07 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 12:44:59PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 09:27:50AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > In -current I added support for the additional I2C busses on piixpm(4) > > now I noticed that on my old AMD system the I2C bus seems to either > > connect all those 4

Re: piixpm(4) on ATI SBx00

2020-01-07 Thread Karel Gardas
Current and patched current dmesg diff below and both dmesgs attached.  real mem = 4009230336 (3823MB) -avail mem = 3875258368 (3695MB) +avail mem = 3875254272 (3695MB)  mpath0 at root  scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets  mainbus0 at root @@ -108,20 +108,9 @@  spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x50: 2GB DDR3

Re: piixpm(4) on ATI SBx00

2020-01-07 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 09:27:50AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > In -current I added support for the additional I2C busses on piixpm(4) > now I noticed that on my old AMD system the I2C bus seems to either > connect all those 4 busses together (or there is a bug in the driver). Looks like this is

piixpm(4) on ATI SBx00

2020-01-07 Thread Claudio Jeker
In -current I added support for the additional I2C busses on piixpm(4) now I noticed that on my old AMD system the I2C bus seems to either connect all those 4 busses together (or there is a bug in the driver). I would like to know if people with ATI SBx00 SMBus chips see the same effect as I do.