Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-29 Thread Maximilian Pichler
Works fine with my Intel HD Graphics 630 (on i7-7700K) at 2560x1440@60Hz. Full-screen glxgears uses the CPU and runs at only 3 fps, though. Max

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-28 Thread Renato Aguiar
Hi Robert, It is working fine on my Ivy Bridge. No regressions. i7-3520M -- Intel HD Graphics 4000 (ThinkPad x230) kern.version=OpenBSD 6.2 (GENERIC.MP) #115: Wed Sep 27 10:45:53 MDT 2017 Regards, Robert Nagy writes: > Hi > > This is an updated diff for preliminary

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-27 Thread Richard Toohey
On 09/28/17 08:43, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: On 09/27/17 18:41, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: On 09/27/17 00:07, Robert Nagy wrote: Hi This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants. This diff is also in snapshots now

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-27 Thread Olivier Cherrier
-8 (ignored) Thanks, Best oc Or Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:07:42AM +0200, rob...@openbsd.org wrote: > Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:07:42 +0200 > From: Robert Nagy <rob...@openbsd.org> > To: tech@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm > > >

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-27 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
On 09/27/17 18:41, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > On 09/27/17 00:07, Robert Nagy wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, >> this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants. >> >> This diff is also in snapshots now so please, test, test test! >

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-27 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
On 09/27/17 00:07, Robert Nagy wrote: > > Hi > > This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, > this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants. > > This diff is also in snapshots now so please, test, test test! Installed the latest snapshot (OpenBSD 6.2 (GENERIC.MP)

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-27 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2017 Sep 27 (Wed) at 00:07:42 +0200 (+0200), Robert Nagy wrote: : :Hi : :This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, :this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants. : :This diff is also in snapshots now so please, test, test test! : :Thank you : Works fine on an

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-27 Thread Manuel Giraud
Matthieu Herrb writes: > No visible regression so far on my IvyBridge and SandyBridge laptops. Same here on a skylake. -- Manuel Giraud

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-27 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:07:42AM +0200, Robert Nagy wrote: > > Hi > > This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, > this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants. > > This diff is also in snapshots now so please, test, test test! No visible regression so far on

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-26 Thread Base Pr1me
Sorry, have to send this from gmail right now. WOO, suspend works! I'll keep testing this week. On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Robert Nagy wrote: > > Hi > > This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, > this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-26 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants. This diff is also in snapshots now so please, test, test test! Thank you Index: sys/dev/pci/drm/i915_pciids.h

preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

2017-09-07 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi! It turns out that the changes to get kabylake to work are quiet minimal so I took a stab at it and backported all the relevant kabylake commits from linux-4.8.y to our drm tree. I did not touch anything outside of dev/pci/drm/i915 on purprose, so that the update work of kettenis@ is only