On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:59:00PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Tati Chevron wrote:
> > But I don't see that touch-based devices are ever going to become the most
> > common devices to run OpenBSD, that's not realistic. Even ignoring servers
> > and headless devices, and only counting devices
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 04:11:21PM +, Tati Chevron wrote:
>
> The touchscreen interfaces I have to use, principally on mobile phones,
> are cumbersome and irritate me no end.
Multitouch support is not only about touchscreens. There are also
modern touchpads (and not only the Apple one) which
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:47:10PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
Tati Chevron wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:13:36AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>Your emails only contain opinions.
"Questions, comments, suggestions and any kind of help would also be
welcome".
Sorry if I mis-understood the
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:32:44AM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
> Ping? No further thoughts on this, no tests? Do I have to conclude that
> most people are happy with wsmouse as it is?
Yes and no. As I told you earlier, I think your diffs contain some very
good work and are required for further
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:29:23PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 05:10:45PM +, Tati Chevron wrote:
why does it have to be integrated into the same mouse driver that everybody
else uses?
Since you seem to care about this topic enough to actually contend
with what
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:59:00PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
Tati Chevron wrote:
But I don't see that touch-based devices are ever going to become the most
common devices to run OpenBSD, that's not realistic. Even ignoring servers and
headless devices, and only counting devices that are used
> >Ulf's mails have diffs attached, and yours don't. Easy choice.
>
> I don't see the connection.
I definately see a connection.
Your emails only contain opinions.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:13:36AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Your emails only contain opinions.
"Questions, comments, suggestions and any kind of help would also be
welcome".
Sorry if I mis-understood the purpose of a mailing list.
--
Tati Chevron
Perl and FORTRAN specialist.
SWABSIT
Tati Chevron wrote:
> But I don't see that touch-based devices are ever going to become the most
> common devices to run OpenBSD, that's not realistic. Even ignoring servers
> and headless devices, and only counting devices that are used interactively
> in some way, I just don't see tablet
> >Tati Chevron wrote:
> >> But I don't see that touch-based devices are ever going to become the most
> >> common devices to run OpenBSD, that's not realistic. Even ignoring
> >> servers and headless devices, and only counting devices that are used
> >> interactively in some way, I just don't
On 12/16/2015 03:11 PM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:32:44AM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
Ping? No further thoughts on this, no tests? Do I have to conclude that
most people are happy with wsmouse as it is?
Hi,
I'd like to see things move forward, but I currently lack
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:55:03PM +, Tati Chevron wrote:
> Sorry to be negative, but I just don't see the perceived value in this.
You wouldn't want to use OpenBSD on a trouchscreen computer if you
had one? Where windows can be moved or resized depending on how many
fingers you use to touch
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:32:44AM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
> Ping? No further thoughts on this, no tests? Do I have to conclude that
> most people are happy with wsmouse as it is?
Hi,
I'd like to see things move forward, but I currently lack time to do
anything serious on this.
One thing
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 04:11:21PM +, Tati Chevron wrote:
> >So I believe this work is important.
>
> I think it's much more important to look at the impact on existing use cases,
> before making changes and introducing a lot of new code that the end user
> can't easily disable, and
Ping? No further thoughts on this, no tests? Do I have to conclude that
most people are happy with wsmouse as it is?
I'm aware that the diff isn't small, but anything smaller would make
some of the remaining parts void and possibly blur the concept. The core
of the approach is actually quite
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:20:15AM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
> The diffs below contain a complete and extensive rewrite of the
> input-processing parts of wsmouse and the interface it provides to
> the hardware drivers. It prepares the support for various kinds of
> multitouch input, as well
Hi,
here are the diffs again, as tgz archive (it's the version I posted
last week, which doesn't include the latest bug fix: hilms is
incomplete in that version and won't work with tablets, only with
mice).
On 12/07/15 15:59, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:20:15AM +0100, Ulf
The diffs below contain a complete and extensive rewrite of the
input-processing parts of wsmouse and the interface it provides to
the hardware drivers. It prepares the support for various kinds of
multitouch input, as well as an extended support for touchpads by
wsmouse.
Tests for regression
18 matches
Mail list logo
