I've gotten one request to decommission qemu-old. It surprised me,
as I thought there were still issues with qemu/ even with the semi recent
thread fix as well as performance differences.
Does anybody have objection to retiring qemu-old to the attic or ?
I'd rather not do this prematurely but
I've gotten one request to decommission qemu-old. It surprised me,
as I thought there were still issues with qemu/ even with the semi recent
thread fix as well as performance differences.
Does anybody have objection to retiring qemu-old to the attic or ?
I'd rather not do this
* Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net [2011-03-21 22:01]:
Does anybody have objection to retiring qemu-old to the attic or ?
yes, I object for the time being.
the laptops where i use(d) qemu most are stuck in tokyo, hadn't had a
chance to try the recently updated 0.14 yet and due to this situation
I withdraw any thoughts of removing qemu-old anytime soon based on feedback.
Henning confirms performance gains for keeping it.
And we have a reminder that while kqemu is not recommended, it is only usable
on qemu-old.
Penned by Todd T. Fries on 20110321 15:58.35, we have:
| I've gotten one
On 21/03/11 5:59 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Todd T. Friest...@fries.net [2011-03-21 22:01]:
Does anybody have objection to retiring qemu-old to the attic or ?
yes, I object for the time being.
the laptops where i use(d) qemu most are stuck in tokyo, hadn't had a
chance to try the recently
On 21/03/11 7:08 PM, Stanley Lieber wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Bradb...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 22/03/11 4:54 PM, Stanley Lieber wrote:
I've gotten one request to decommission qemu-old. It surprised me,
as I thought there were still issues with qemu/ even with the semi recent
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Brad b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 22/03/11 4:54 PM, Stanley Lieber wrote:
I've gotten one request to decommission qemu-old. B It surprised me,
as I thought there were still issues with qemu/ even with the semi recent
thread fix as well as performance
