On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:32:23PM +0100, Tom Murphy wrote:
Stefan,
Your patch works well on my system:
ral0 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 Ralink RT2661 rev 0x00: irq 10, address
00:14:85:d5:39:bb
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2661D, RF RT2529 (MIMO XR)
Only problem is downloading from the
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 07:21:50PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:32:23PM +0100, Tom Murphy wrote:
Stefan,
Your patch works well on my system:
ral0 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 Ralink RT2661 rev 0x00: irq 10, address
00:14:85:d5:39:bb
ral0: MAC/BBP
Stefan,
Your patch works well on my system:
ral0 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 Ralink RT2661 rev 0x00: irq 10, address
00:14:85:d5:39:bb
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2661D, RF RT2529 (MIMO XR)
Only problem is downloading from the net is extremely slow. Benchmarks
have it at 512 KB/sec as opposed to
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:17:09PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:31:31PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
Finally got around to dig out the card and put it in a Blade 1500. With
-current, I get around 10Mb using tcpbench. With your diff,
freelist corruption messages pop
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:31:18PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I haven't received any test reports so far, apart from my own
testing and edd@'s testing. It's been working splendid for me
so far but I would like to get more testing if possible.
I've Bcc'd some people who were involved in
ral(4) cards using the rt2661 driver code (RT2561, RT2561S, RT2661
variants) suffer a race in TX interrupt handling which can cause
TX processing to get stuck.
This problem was previously discussed here:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=125895269930106w=2
The patch proposed there was rejected by
