Re: removing wsmouse_input [2]: zts, hilms, uts

The input functions of wsmouse have changed completely, this also concerns ums/hidms. All tests are - and will be - welcome ;-) On 06/06/2016 11:31 PM, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 01:53:01PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 12:40:24PM +0100, Edd Barrett

Re: removing wsmouse_input [2]: zts, hilms, uts

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 01:53:01PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 12:40:24PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > > I have a uts. > > > > I can test later. Am I expecting to see any functional change? > > No change is expected. It should just work. Ah, my apologies, my

Re: removing wsmouse_input [2]: zts, hilms, uts

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 12:40:24PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > I have a uts. > > I can test later. Am I expecting to see any functional change? No change is expected. It should just work.

Re: removing wsmouse_input [2]: zts, hilms, uts

I have a uts. I can test later. Am I expecting to see any functional change? On 5 June 2016 15:55:19 BST, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> From: Ulf Brosziewski >> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 09:55:07 +0200 >> >> ok? > >Would have been nice if somebody

Re: removing wsmouse_input [2]: zts, hilms, uts

Again, I think the risk is small. A test with hilms would have been nice, of course (unfortunately, I didn't succeed in contacting Miod). On 06/05/16 10:38, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 09:55:07AM +0200, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: >> ok? > > Again, I can't test this, but it's ok

Re: removing wsmouse_input [2]: zts, hilms, uts

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 09:55:07AM +0200, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > ok? Again, I can't test this, but it's ok by me. I like the new wsmouse interface a lot better than the old one. > On 06/01/2016 01:23 AM, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > > zts, hilms, and uts are the drivers that still use

Re: removing wsmouse_input [2]: zts, hilms, uts

ok? On 06/01/2016 01:23 AM, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > zts, hilms, and uts are the drivers that still use wsmouse_input > with absolute coordinates (or with both types of coordinates). > The new, "flag-less" interface of wsmouse requires calls of > wsmouse_position, and, possibly, of wsmouse_touch

removing wsmouse_input [2]: zts, hilms, uts

zts, hilms, and uts are the drivers that still use wsmouse_input with absolute coordinates (or with both types of coordinates). The new, "flag-less" interface of wsmouse requires calls of wsmouse_position, and, possibly, of wsmouse_touch in this case. Questions, tests and OKs would be welcome.