On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 06:24:44PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 07:00:03PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > For some reasons various ids were stored as size_t (probably because once
> > they used to be the index in an array). This is just silly and annoyed me
> > for long eno
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 07:00:03PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> For some reasons various ids were stored as size_t (probably because once
> they used to be the index in an array). This is just silly and annoyed me
> for long enough. I think this fixes all of them.
>
> While there also stop using
For some reasons various ids were stored as size_t (probably because once
they used to be the index in an array). This is just silly and annoyed me
for long enough. I think this fixes all of them.
While there also stop using size_t for maxlength of a prefix. Everywhere
else the code uses just a un
