On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 12:23:51AM +0100, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
>
> > rtadvd contains code to send unicast replies, RFC4861 mentions this
> > possibility (section 6.2.6) but I'm having a hard time thinking how it
> > could be useful.
> >
> > Since the sending part is commented out
> rtadvd contains code to send unicast replies, RFC4861 mentions this
> possibility (section 6.2.6) but I'm having a hard time thinking how it
> could be useful.
>
> Since the sending part is commented out since it was introduced, I doubt
> that anyone will miss it. This removes pointless memory
rtadvd contains code to send unicast replies, RFC4861 mentions this
possibility (section 6.2.6) but I'm having a hard time thinking how it
could be useful.
Since the sending part is commented out since it was introduced, I doubt
that anyone will miss it. This removes pointless memory
