On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 02:51:44PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> while debugging a pebkac in -portable, I noticed that in various
> places we use fatal() for libtls failures. errno doesn't generally
> contains anything useful after libtls functions, and in most it's
> explicitly cleared to avoid
On Tue, 16 May 2023 14:51:44 +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> while debugging a pebkac in -portable, I noticed that in various
> places we use fatal() for libtls failures. errno doesn't generally
> contains anything useful after libtls functions, and in most it's
> explicitly cleared to avoid misuse.
>
while debugging a pebkac in -portable, I noticed that in various
places we use fatal() for libtls failures. errno doesn't generally
contains anything useful after libtls functions, and in most it's
explicitly cleared to avoid misuse.
just to provide a quick example, with `listen on ... ciphers
